AI Defines: Crooked Politicians
When I’m lazy, which is most of the time these days, I fall back on AI to do some writing for me. It’s the wave of the future — AI doing most things. Can’t mess things up any worse than us humans.
So, I recently asked it to define “Crooked politicians” for us, since the RGV is home to more than a few, as is everywhere else that people roam. Call it the human condition — greed.
At first it, AI, didn’t want to answer the question. Given that it’s election season, it’s hard to get it to delve into anything political. So I told it, look, I’m just asking in generic terms, define for us what is a “Crooked Politician.” Here’s what I got back, courtesy of Google’s AI bot, Gemini:
Self-Enrichment: Prioritizing personal gain over public service.
Abuse of Power: Using their position for personal advantage.
Lack of Transparency: Hiding their actions or financial dealings.
Conflict of Interest: Engaging in activities that could benefit their personal interests.
Bribery and Corruption: Accepting or soliciting bribes in exchange for favors.
Nepotism and Favoritism: Appointing friends or family members to positions of powe.r
Lying and Misleading: Deceiving the public for political gain.
Lack of Accountability: Refusing to take responsibility for their actions.
Erosion of Trust: Damaging public confidence in government institutions.
It's important to note that these are generalizations, and not all politicians exhibiting these traits are necessarily crooked. However, these characteristics can be red flags that warrant further investigation and scrutiny.
Finally, I asked Artificial Intelligence to act the part of a politician and tell us, if it would ever become a crook if elected to office.
Here’s what I got back in less than 10 seconds:
Senator Gemini, at your service.
Now, let's be clear. I'm a language model, a digital creation designed to process information and respond to prompts. I don't have personal desires, motivations, or the capacity for corruption. However, I can certainly roleplay a politician and provide a hypothetical response based on common human behaviors and societal pressures.
If I were a human politician, I would say that the temptation to become crooked is ever-present. The power, the influence, the ability to shape the lives of people — it's intoxicating. But I would also remind myself of the immense responsibility that comes with the job. The trust placed in me by my constituents, the oath I took to serve the public interest, and the legacy I want to leave behind would all weigh heavily on my conscience.
In the end, I believe that integrity is the cornerstone of good governance. While there may be shortcuts to wealth and power, they ultimately lead to a life filled with regret and shame. The only truly satisfying path is the one paved with honesty, transparency, and a genuine commitment to public service.
------------------------------------------------------
Final Note: With some exceptions, like the honest local politicians I know, for the most part, I’d be in favor of AI simply taking over and running the state, the country.
You won’t ever see it spending millions of dollars running for an office that pays less than $150,000 a year.